I’ve been led into deep thoughts from recent random
events. First, the events:
- Two weeks ago I celebrated my birthday with my annual reading of Seneca’s On theShortness of Life.
- Yesterday I read of the death of Tim Stack, 60, CEO of Piedmont Healthcare, a prominent hospital system here in Atlanta.
- Today I saw the report of the death of Gore Vidal, 86, celebrated author.
Now, the deep thoughts:
I never met Tim Stack or Gore Vidal, but I couldn’t help
thinking of each as a reference point for me: if I live to Mr. Stack’s age, I
have 16 years left; if I live to Mr. Vidal’s age, I have 42 years left. That’s a big difference. What would I do differently today if I knew
for certain that I have only 16 years left to live rather than 42?
Enter Seneca:
“…all save a very few find life at an end just as they are getting ready to live.”
I’ve known people for whom that is true; they look forward
their entire working lives to retirement, so that they can really live, and then they die
or become incapacitated and can’t do it.
It is tragic and sad when it happens.
I don’t want to do that, and if it comes to pass that I have only 16
years left, I need to get busy living.
But what if it turns out I have 42 years left? How do I prepare for a long future life,
which may not come, without passing up on too much life today, which I certainly
have right now?
Getting this balance right is very difficult. It is unrealistic for most of us to extract
ourselves from common bourgeois existence to pursue leisure full time. (I’m using “leisure” here in the classical
sense, meaning activities that have intrinsic value in themselves, without
regard for the ends they might achieve, like money.) Yet at the same time, many of us realize
that the hectic pace of modern American life, a treadmill of earn --> acquire
--> earn more --> acquire more, with very little time devoted to leisure
pursuits, probably isn’t the best way to live, either. We know we should get off the treadmill at
some point, hence the “When I retire, then….” dreams. But should we really put off good living
until then? Do we run the risk of
fulfilling Seneca’s prediction that we find life at an end just as we are
getting ready to live?
Yet there seems to no good or easy time to get off the
treadmill early. We need to pay off the
student loans; then we need the bigger house; then we need to put the kids
through school; by then there is the beach house to take care of, too, and the
wardrobe to keep current, and then electronic gadgets seem to need upgrading
more frequently than ever…….
Enter Seneca again:
…”very wretched , therefore, and not merely short, must the life of those be who work hard to gain what they must work harder to keep. By great toil they attain what they wish, and with anxiety hold what they have attained; meanwhile they take no account of time that will never more return.”
And so it is that the treadmill remains attractive because
our focus rests on the fruits of our labor:
the trinkets, tokens, and totems of success that our society has deemed
valuable. But the very real risk is that
we overvalue the trinkets while we undervalue the time that it takes to earn
them; we assume we have an unlimited store of time from which to draw; and when
that turns out not to be true, we are surprised by the shortness of our
lives. The true value of our time
suddenly comes into focus, just as we run out of it; and we find ourselves with no
time to really live.
So how do we find the right balance? How can we really live throughout our lives,
and not save all the good stuff for the end that may get cut short? There are no easy or obvious answers. But it is certainly something to think about.
“Why do you delay? Why are you idle? Unless you seize the day, it flees.”-Seneca
No comments:
Post a Comment